Forget Miss America - the Social Bookmarking Winner Is....

| | Comments (0)

How many social bookmarking sites are on a slow road to obscurity? Which is best to use?

Social bookmarking services generally segment into three categories:

  • General purpose (del.icio.us, google bookmarks)
  • Blog / comment (bloglines, google blog search, co.mments)
  • News (digg, reddit).
The nifty compete.com site shows Digg, Technorati, del.icio.us, and Reddit leading the news category - and if you want to check your boomarking choices, go to the compete.com home page where you can quickly chart their traffic.


Here we see the top 40 charted by the Socializer bookmarking API provider.

social.bookmarking.popularity.jpg

News-markers Digg / Reddit are growing extremely fast - Digg hits tripled from last year.  So here is the list, ranked by hits. See the rest of this post for more.

Digg, Netscape, MyWeb2, del.icio.us, Backflip, Reddit, Furl, Spurl, Blogmarks, Technorati, Blinkbits, Stumbleupon, Buddymarks, Diigo, Blinklist, Feedmelinks, Newsvine, Magnolia, Wink, Givealink, Linkagogo, Citeulike, Rawsugar, Gravee, Rojo, Shadows, Simpy, Igooi, Plugim, Linkroll, Zurpy, Hyperlinkomatic, Lilisto, Kinja, Netvouz, Tagtooga, Looklater, Squidoo, Dzone, Feedmarker, Segnalo, Scuttle, Wists, Maple, Tailrank, Mesfavs, Unalog (source: Socializer).


Compete.com provides a velocity chart which measures relative growth between domains. Here we
see Reddit’s growth (against a much smaller base than Digg, so don’t be
impressed) and Technorati’s moribund trend — could it be their
illiterati interface and irrelevant search engine results?


Web science tells us that web content has a "long tail" distribution with an extremely high number of content variations. Social bookmarking content providers follow this pattern - there are over 50 of them, and none have more than 5% of the total. However, there is a cluster of the strongest - Digg, Del.iciou.us, Reddit, MyWeb (yahoo), Netscape, Google, and Technorati.

Though the value of a network is theoretically supposed to increase exponentially based on the number of nodes, isn't there a point of negative feedback when the complexity becomes too great? Too many choices can have a negative utility? As Charlene Li has complained, there is no "services architecture" for web 2.0 that provides seamless integration of personal information (social graphs) such as bookmarks. It is a challenge to publishers trying to accomodate user audiences and their numerous social bookmarking options.

social.bookmarking.popularity.jpg



Service Percentage of Clicks
Digg5.6%
Netscape4.6%
MyWeb24.5%
del.icio.us4.3%
Backflip3.9%
Reddit3.6%
Furl3.6%
Spurl3.2%
Blogmarks3.0%
Technorati2.9%
Blinkbits2.7%
Stumbleupon2.6%
Buddymarks2.5%
Diigo2.5%
Blinklist2.4%
Feedmelinks2.2%
Newsvine2.1%
Magnolia2.1%
Wink2.0%
Givealink1.9%
Linkagogo1.8%
Citeulike1.8%
Rawsugar1.8%
Gravee1.7%
Rojo1.7%
Shadows1.7%
Simpy1.7%
Igooi1.7%
Plugim1.7%
Linkroll1.6%
Zurpy1.6%
Hyperlinkomatic1.6%
Lilisto1.5%
Kinja1.5%
Netvouz1.5%
Tagtooga1.5%
Looklater1.5%
Squidoo1.3%
Dzone1.2%
Feedmarker1.2%
Segnalo1.1%
Scuttle1.0%
Wists1.0%
Maple1.0%
Tailrank0.9%
Mesfavs0.8%
Unalog0.7%



Leave a comment